Human cultural differences consists of visible and invisible dimensions. Our assumptions about reality (Worldviews) produce and develop our beliefs and values, while the invisible dimensions guide and direct our visible behavior.
A profound cultural contrast. One half of the picture displays a traditional Chinese tea ceremony conducted by a middle-aged South Asian woman, surrounded by ancient porcelain teaware and red silk drapes. The calmness, precision, and tranquility of the scene symbolize the age-old traditions and spiritual practices. Conversely, the other half of the picture portrays a vibrant Brazilian carnival with an elderly Black man in samba dance attire, surrounded by bright feathers, booming drums, and energetic crowds, representing the passionate social festivities of contemporary culture.
No two individuals are identical. True human clones do not exist. Within a single family, genetic differences make each person unique. No two small communities are exactly the same. And as we ascend the hierarchy of culture, the differences shout at us: “We are different!” While similarities do exist, the cultural differences and variety are astonishing. When we consider the human capacity for choice—somewhat, but not always, influenced by culture (rebellion exists in everyone)—we start to recognize the potential for conflict between families, communities, cultures, and nations.
Every individual, raised in their own culture, struggles to understand those from different backgrounds. Our cultural conflicts, as seen in ongoing wars, continue to plague humanity. Ethnocentrism is defined as “seeing one’s own race or cultural group as superior to others.”
Although we usually can’t completely rid ourselves of it, we can manage it to prevent breakdowns in relationships. The solution involves recognizing the overlap of similarities and differences between cultures.
Cultures share similarities in form and function, yet differ in expression. Here’s a deeper exploration of this concept.
1. Universal Form and Function:
2. Differences in Expression:
3. Cultural Expressions of Core Functions:
4. Expressions of Shared Values:
The God of the Bible is light. There are no photos of the God of the Bible.
Edward T. Hall, an influential anthropologist, developed the concepts of high-context and low-context cultures to highlight how communication styles vary across different societies. These distinctions help us understand how people from diverse cultural backgrounds interpret messages and engage in communication. Edward T. Hall, The Hidden Dimension, Anchor Books, a Doubleday Book, October 1, 1990.
High-Context Cultures
In high-context cultures, communication relies significantly on the surrounding context rather than explicit verbal expression. Much of the meaning is derived from non-verbal cues, shared experiences, and implicit messages. Relationships and social ties are highly valued; therefore, communication often encompasses an understanding of social hierarchies, mutual backgrounds, and in-group knowledge.
Countries like Japan, China, Arab nations, and various Latin American countries are generally classified as high-context. In these cultures, interpersonal relationships are essential, and individuals often prioritize group harmony and consensus over personal expression.
Communication tends to be indirect. Subtle cues, tone of voice, facial expressions, and even silence can carry significant meanings. Messages may be ambiguous and often require the listener to read between the lines or rely on contextual knowledge for understanding. High-context communication fosters strong interpersonal relationships but can lead to misunderstandings with individuals from low-context backgrounds who may expect clear and direct information.
Low-Context Cultures
In low-context cultures, communication is more explicit, placing a greater emphasis on directness and clarity. The message itself conveys the primary meaning, independent of context. Individualism is often emphasized, valuing personal autonomy and the expression of personal opinions.
Countries such as the United States, Canada, Germany, and Scandinavian nations exemplify low-context cultures. These societies prioritize clear communication and straightforward information exchanges.
Messages are delivered directly and clearly. There is a strong reliance on verbal communication, with words expected to convey the intended message without depending on non-verbal cues or shared experiences. People from low-context cultures may express disagreement or differing opinions openly, viewing direct communication as a sign of honesty and transparency. While low-context communication can lead to misunderstandings in high-context interactions, it promotes clarity and minimizes the risk of misinterpretation, allowing for efficient information exchange.
Geert Hofstede developed another approach to cultural differences.
His theory focuses on the dimensions of culture: power distance,
individualism, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, and long-term
orientation.
Gert Jan Hofstede, Paul B. Pedersen, and Geert Hofstede, Exploring Culture: Exercises, Stories, and Synthetic Cultures,
Nicholas Brealey (August 1, 2002).
Geert Hofstede’s dimensions of culture offer a framework for understanding how cultural values affect behavior and communication in various societies. Hofstede’s research identified several key dimensions that demonstrate how cultural differences influence people’s interactions and organizational practices. Here’s a summary of the five dimensions:
1. Individualism vs. Collectivism
2. Power Distance:
3. Masculinity vs. Femininity:
4. Uncertainty Avoidance:
5. Long-Term Orientation vs. Short-Term Orientation:
In her book, Foreign to Familiar: A Guide to Understanding Hot and Cold Climate Cultures, Sarah Lanier offers a different perspective on cultural differences.
According to the "hot-cold climate culture" theory, hot-climate cultures are typically more relationship-focused, emphasizing community and indirect communication, whereas cold-climate cultures are generally task-oriented, valuing individualism and direct communication. Essentially, hot-climate cultures prioritize forging strong personal connections, while cold-climate cultures focus on completing tasks efficiently.
The key differences:
Focus on relationships versus tasks: Hot-climate cultures prioritize establishing strong relationships, viewing them as crucial for success, while cold-climate cultures focus on efficiently completing tasks and may place more value on individual achievements than on group dynamics. Communication style: Hot climate cultures often prefer indirect communication, relying on non-verbal cues and shying away from direct confrontation, whereas cold climate cultures are typically more direct and explicit in their communication.
Time perception: Hot-climate cultures often exhibit a more flexible attitude toward time and are less strict about schedules, whereas cold-climate cultures typically adopt a stricter approach to time management.
Social norms: Hot-climate cultures tend to emphasize collectivism, with a strong emphasis on group identity and belonging, while cold-climate cultures lean towards individualism, prioritizing personal space and autonomy.
Examples:
While "high context" and "low context" are often associated with "hot climate" and "cold climate" cultures respectively, they are not the same thing:
“High/low context" refers specifically to communication styles where a lot of meaning is conveyed through unspoken cues (high context) or explicitly stated words (low context).
Whereas "hot/cold climate" describes cultural tendencies often linked to geographical climate, with "hot" cultures tending towards more relationship-focused and indirect communication (similar to high context) and "cold" cultures leaning towards task-oriented and direct communication (similar to low context).
Key Differences: "High/low context" focuses primarily on how information is conveyed in communication, while "hot/cold climate" looks at broader cultural values and behaviors potentially influenced by climate.
High context" implies reliance on shared understanding and non-verbal cues to interpret meaning.
"Low context" means most meaning is explicitly stated in words.
Top "assumes," while Bottom "asks."
Cultural Association: While there is a tendency for "hot climate" cultures to be considered "high context" and "cold climate" cultures to be "low context," this is not always a strict correlation and can vary depending on the specific culture.
High Context Example: In a high context culture, someone might simply say "It's getting a bit chilly in here" to subtly indicate they want a window closed, relying on the other person to understand the implied request based on the situation.
Low Context Example: In a low-context culture, someone would directly say, “Please close the window; it’s cold,” to clearly convey their request without relying on unspoken cues.
In summary, while cultures around the world share commonalities in form and function—rooted in shared human needs and challenges—their expressions vary significantly due to historical, geographical, and environmental factors. This “neutral” diversity typically emerges cautiously and positively to promote survival and prevent conflict, or more negatively, depending on a culture’s historical interactions with its neighbors. The desire to build relationships with individuals from different cultures primarily exists at the personal or small group level.